I've always been a fan of the Coordinape type of compensation model feel as if people need to be recognized for the work they have contributed.
I think the proposal makes the assumption that inactive members will become active due to the compensation aspect. I'm not sure if this will be the case. I think these circles tend to work the best when there is already an active group of people.
Some questions/comments:
Which month do you want to start this? As soon as it passes in Nov? There will need to be extensive communication with the community.
I'm confused by the in-person giving circle.
4.4.5. - "To participate in the circle (that is, to award giving points to each other), one must be present in our monthly in-person meeting and be a DAO member"
and
"It is understandable that there will be times when even highly engaged members simply won’t be able to attend in-person meetings. It is worth highlighting that members can still be recognized and compensated for their contributions even if they are not present."
So if people contribute during that month but are unable to make the monthly meeting would they be able to participate in the circle?
While I think in-person events and interactions are very important I don't think missing one meeting should disqualify someone from earning through the circle. A lot of our work is done asynchronously and I don't see why this should be any different. In fact, during the member interviews, some people said they wouldn't be able to be as active off-line as they could be online. While ATX DAO is meant to facilitate local connections those connections and contributions could still happen online. Coordinape is also built to work with remote teams.
- The proposal calls for 3 guilds. We initially had 5 committees and expanded to 11. What will be the procedure to add guilds? A simple proposal vote?
